Project context
Site location, project type, current stage, intended use and the decision or outcome needed.
Structural engineering support for module mounting structures, including load paths, member checks, stability, connections and deflection review based on project-specific criteria.
Solar mounting structures need to transfer the effects of wind and other applicable loads through rails, members, connections and supports. The review depends on the proposed geometry, site exposure, system details and agreed design basis.
The first review should establish what information is available, what assumptions are proposed and which decisions the work must support. Any limitations that affect the conclusions should be recorded before the deliverable is used by the wider team.
The required information changes by service. These are useful starting points; the final input list should match the actual project.
Site location, project type, current stage, intended use and the decision or outcome needed.
Available drawings, loading criteria, equipment data, surveys or geotechnical information where relevant.
Agreed deliverables, assumptions, exclusions, review responsibilities, revisions and timing.
Some assignments need coordination across more than one workstream. Any combined scope should be agreed before work begins.
Review available drawings and site information to understand how the roof and supporting structure may respond to additional solar dead, maintenance and wind loads.
Explore service ↗Coordinate foundation design with structural reactions and project-specific geotechnical information. The final solution should reflect actual ground conditions and installation constraints.
Explore service ↗Early-stage structural and site coordination to identify constraints before detailed design, procurement and installation decisions are locked.
Explore service ↗Practical answers about the inputs, limitations and deliverables that matter for this kind of work.
The project location, array layout, module data, mounting geometry, support spacing, applicable wind criteria and relevant soil or foundation information are useful starting points. If some details are pending, we can list them as open inputs.
The connection checks and detailing expected should be written into the scope. A member-size review by itself does not confirm that the full load path, anchorage and supporting foundation are adequate.
Only after the new project's criteria and geometry have been checked. Wind exposure, array layout, heights, spans and foundation conditions can differ enough to affect the result.
That depends on the agreed brief. The proposal should identify whether analysis, design calculations, drawings, connection details or review comments are required and which inputs are to be supplied by the client.
Share the site, the project stage and the information already available.